Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Labor Law Violations.

Considering working for Alycia Kaback? Read this first!

I love how Alycia and her little party pals *Cough Brandi Lukas* are trying to claim my blog is "defamation" and "slander." considering the fact there is plenty of evidence on this blog to back up my claims against Alycia Kaback and Mr. Fomkin.

This is one of those cases and this time I have the United States court system to back me up. I have found several court documents where Alycia Kaback and Michael Fomkin violate labor laws. I shall link these documents, but they are long reads filled with all kinds of lawyer words, But don't you worry, I know how to speak lawyer!!!! (Somewhat) So I will translate these for you. This is what its like to work for these two headcases.

Here is the court document of Alycia Kaback getting her dismissal claim shot down by a judge.

http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/13d1001p.pdf

According to the facts set forth in the Complaint, Plaintiff Samantha Schneider
commenced employment with Defendant IT Factor Productions (“IT Factor”) on September 4,
2012. (Compl. ¶ 6.) During her first four weeks of employment, Plaintiff was classified as being
in “training,” essentially receiving no compensation, despite working twenty-three of twenty-five
days during the period from September 4, 2012 to September 28, 2012. (Id. ¶ 7.) Defendant IT
Factor did not pay Plaintiff the legally-prescribed minimum hourly wage. (Id. ¶ 8.)

If you don't feel like reading lawyer talk. She went 23 days with no pay under the bullshit pretense of "training period." Sorry assholes, that violates labor laws! Oh, but the fun doesn't stop there, this story gets MUCH better. Well better for me and you the reader anyway, It won't be better for Alycia, Fomkin, and their band of dingleberries as this will completely ruin their companies reputation which I think will be FUNNY! Let us continue!

As of September 29, 2012, Plaintiff was placed on IT Factor’s payroll. (Id. ¶ 9.) At the
time of her hiring, she was not advised that she would be expected to work more than forty hours
per week. (Id. ¶ 10.) From September 29, 2012 to the last date of her employment on January18, 2013, however, there were numerous weeks in which Plaintiff was forced to work more than
forty hours per week without receiving overtime pay at the rate of one and a half times her
regular rate for each hour over forty which she worked per week. (Id. ¶ 11.) In addition, she was
required to travel to an office location one hour away from her home, sit in a small interior
windowless office with three other employees, and work long hours, six days per week. (Id. ¶
12.) Anytime she left her desk, even to use the bathroom or get food, she was admonished by IT
Factor’s management, including President and Chief Executive Officer Alycia Kaback and
Plaintiff’s immediate supervisor Michael Fomkin. (Id. ¶ 13.)

OUCH! 40 hours per week in a small windowless office with no overtime pay (also against labor laws) with fat fuck Fomkin and Alycia Kabitch yelling at you anytime you need to take a piss. Lets move on!

Plaintiff was advised that she had to contact and sign up an unachievable number of
people as “talent,” which caused her to work long hours. (Id. ¶ 16.) Although she was given

various job titles, she never had any management responsibilities. (Id. ¶ 17.) 

Next time someone from It Factor tells you who they are, and what their job title is, don't believe them.....

On numerous occasions, Plaintiff complained about the working conditions to
management and questioned the lack of overtime pay and the manner in which she was being
compensated. (Id. ¶ 14.) Each time, Plaintiff was advised that she would be “promoted” soon
and that she was being paid in accordance with the law. (Id. ¶ 15.) In addition, every time she
attempted to address pay issues, she was forced to deal with even more onerous work conditions. 
(Id. ¶ 19.) Over time, the intolerable work conditions started to affect Plaintiff’s health. (Id.)
When Plaintiff addressed this situation with Michael Fomkin, he told her that if she did not like
it, then leave. (Id. ¶ 20.) As of January 2013—a point at which Plaintiff was one of IT Factor’s
longest tenured employees—the work conditions and hours had become increasingly intolerable
2and she again addressed the situation with Fomkin, who again advised her to leave if she did not
like it. (Id. ¶ 21–22.) As Plaintiff needed to make a living, however, she continued to endure the
work conditions. (Id. ¶ 23.)

Here are the cliff notes for this one. Since they didn't pay her overtime, anytime she brought this up, Michael and Alycia decided to be little slave masters and made the work conditions more intolerable on purpose. 

On January 18, 2013, Plaintiff’s last day of employment with IT Factor, Defendant
Kaback came into the area where Plaintiff was working and screamed, “Get off the phone now.” 
(Id. ¶ 24.) Kaback then brought Plaintiff to her office where Fomkin screamed at the top of his
lungs, saying that he bugged Plaintiff’s phone, that she did not sound positive, and that she was
bringing the company down with how negative she was. (Id. ¶ 25.) Fomkin then said he “wasn’t
firing” Plaintiff, but she had to take four days off and, if she wanted her job back, she had to
email him 2,000 words explaining why he should let her keep her job. (Id. ¶ 27.) Plaintiff avers
that IT Factor had no intention of ever letting her work there in the future and the plan was to
claim that she resigned. (Id. ¶ 28.) Plaintiff also believes that Defendants’ actions were in direct
retaliation for her complaints about IT Factor’s policies, which constitute federal and state law
wage payment violations. (Id. ¶ 29.)

Michael and Alycia both go apeshit at her for no reason other than an attempt to force her to resign by bullying her. Oh god, I have never heard or seen them do that before..... Its not like these two have a HISTORY of this.... Oh wait, thats right. THEY BOTH DO! On 3 other fucking occasions! Now onto the BEST part.

AND NOW, this 9 day of December, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant Alycia
Kaback’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 4) and Plaintiff Samantha Schneider’s Response
(Docket No. 5), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. All Defendants shall file
their Answers to the Complaint with twenty (20) days from the date of this Order.

It is so ORDERED.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! Sorry Alycia, JUSTICE prevails!

To Samantha; thank you for having the courage to stand up to these bullies and take them to court. 


OH! Masked Vigilante Productions now has a facebook page. Go like it and share it with your friends! Especially if your friends are actors/models/singers/dancers etc. People NEED to know that a scam is afoot!





No comments:

Post a Comment